Which statement about hunting privileges is true?

Hunting privileges are granted to individuals who comply with the laws and regulations governing hunting practices. The statement that they can be revoked if laws are broken is true because hunting is regulated to ensure safety, conservation, and ethical practices. When a hunter violates regulations—whether through illegal hunting, unsafe practices, or failing to follow licensing requirements—it can lead to the suspension or revocation of their hunting privileges.

This system is in place to encourage responsible hunting and to protect wildlife populations. Violations could involve significant breaches, such as hunting out of season, hunting without a proper license, or engaging in unethical practices. Revoking hunting privileges serves as a deterrent to prevent future violations and to uphold the integrity of hunting as a regulated activity.

By contrast, the other statements imply that hunting privileges are either permanent or only revoked for severe violations, which does not accurately reflect the regulatory framework designed to enforce compliance with hunting laws.