Which statement about arrows is true?

The assertion that an arrow is as deadly as a bullet is accurate because both types of projectiles can inflict serious injury or death, depending on factors such as the type of game being hunted, the skill of the shooter, and the conditions of the shot. Arrows create a significant wound channel and can penetrate deeply, similar to bullets, especially when using broadhead arrow tips designed for hunting. The lethality of either projectile is influenced by their respective design, velocity, and the method of use, which can allow arrows to be extremely effective in hunting scenarios. This perspective highlights the importance of ethical hunting practices and an understanding of the capabilities of each equipment type in terms of lethality.

The other statements are inaccurate because they misrepresent the use and effectiveness of arrows. While arrows are not typically used for target shooting alone, they are designed for various applications, including hunting. Additionally, arrows can be as lethal as firearms, particularly when appropriately used for hunting purposes. Lastly, to suggest that arrows are ineffective for hunting does not take into account the thousands of successful hunts that utilize archery equipment.